Evaluation Rubric
Name of Group ___________________________
|
Beginning 1 |
Developing 2 |
Accomplished 3 |
Exemplary 4 |
Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Group Work 25 pts.
|
Little positive interaction. Members' conversation minimal. Participation is imbalanced. | Group members discuss work and help each other to a moderate extent. Participation is somewhat balanced. | Cooperation, communication, review of each others' parts with a shared purpose to succeed clearly evident. Participation is balanced. | Team spirit develops. The project proceeds smoothly to successful conclusion through the cooperation of all members. |
|
|
Mechanical 5 pts.
|
Many technical glitches appear in the presentation; many spelling and grammatical errors. Only a few of the project components are included. | Some technical problems appear; some spelling and grammatical errors. Some parts of the project are missing or incomplete. | The presentation runs smoothly with few problems; very few spelling and grammatical errors. All parts of the project are completed. | Presentation runs smoothly with no technical problems; honors all rules of spelling and grammar. All parts of project are completed to the fullest extent. |
|
|
Multimedia Elements 20 pts.
|
Design is not appropriate to theme. Presentation has too much text. Multimedia elements (buttons, links, graphics) are not related to the intended ideas. | Design supports the theme. Graphics, video, audio, etc. are somewhat effective in conveying the intended meaning. Text inconsistently clear, and/or the multimedia effects detract from the presentation | The combination of multimedia elements and content communicate the intended ideas clearly. All graphics are used effectively to convey the intended meaning. | The multimedia design demonstrates creativity and originality as it conveys a mood of fun, celebration, and patriotism. |
|
|
Quality of Content 25 pts.
|
Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors | Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors. | Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good. | Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. |
|
|
Documentation 5 pts. |
The sources are not cited. | Sources are cited, some incompletely. | Most sources are properly cited. | All sources are properly cited. Permission to use copyrighted text or images has been requested and granted. |
|
|
Oral Presentation
20 pts.
|
Not all members of group present. Limited eye contact. Presenters read notes. Spoken language difficult to understand. | All members of group present. Some eye contact. Presenters rely on notes. Some enunciation difficult to understand, but generally clear. | All members of group present. Good eye contact. Presenters address audience. Minimal use of notes. Enunciation completely clear. | All members of group present. Presenters address audience. Minimal use of notes. Enunciation completely clear. Presenters exhibit enthusiasm and confidence. |